I write because we need our purpose in an elevator pitch.
We are building a network of people.
We are the owner-operators of a social network.
Our business model is subscription fees and FRANCHISOR fees.
I feel terrible terrible that there is personal animus or FUD, in any way. But… Knowing and seeing clearly, right where we are, is so important right now at the start.
I am pro EDEN.
I am not anti-EOS …
However, if Dan wants a tariff, then… it’s lock in.
I am not anti-tariff. I am pro pick the right platform from the start to tariff yourself into!!
I am Clarion neutral, thus far, because I have not seen them present us with a total budget estimate; and/or, ANY estimate, for services rendered thus far!!!
I think Eden will not be governing the public blockchain of EOS, anytime soon.
I THINK IT IS WISE FOR EDEN TO BECOME ITS OWN PILLAR.
@daniel_keyes is a great talent with great potential and with success ahead,… But, I disagree that the purpose of EDEN is merely to distribute EOS gifted funds.
EDEN needs a business plan.
EDEN needs to execute a business plan, centered upon good governance.
I suggest that Eden can create a social network of computers, with hardware software and internet access, and collect access fees.
The fractal and Franchisor models can dovetail.
EDEN would be a Franchisor-franchisee Nodes, selling subscriptions.
We live in a Tokenized world, so EDEN Network subscribers will pay in tokens…
Dan Larimer tokens is his forte, so we need to hear on the tokonomics of an Eden social network.