EOSCommunity.org Forums

Eos社区治理和发展的深度思考(草稿第二部分)

2,EOS社区治理的根本共识是什么

正是由于EOS社区治理的根本共识没有达成,所以,如果我们问任何一个人,包括BM。我们EOS社区治理需要达成的根本共识,可以用一句话来表述吗。我想,或许暂时还没有人能表述出来。

我们都知道,现在世界上唯一的超级大国美国,就是400年前在一个社区共识的基础上发展起来的。这个社区共识,就是《五月花号公约》。这个共识,如果要用一句话来表述,可以这么归纳:我们这些上帝的信徒,自愿构建一种新秩序,并在此基础上建设一个能体现大家共同利益的新社会(国家)。

这里面包含了三重含义,或者说回答了三个问题。

2.1 我们是谁(上帝的信徒)

2.2 我们想做什么(建设有共同利益的新社会)

2.3 我们将怎样做(构建新秩序)

对照BM的社区治理草案。我们可以发现,BM在这个草案中,只回答了第三个问题。我们将怎样做。而没有回答更重要的谁来做、做什么。

BM在草案中提到,社区治理的第一个难题,就是“确定谁在社区中,谁不在社区中”。这其实就是第一个问题。社区应该由什么样的人组成,治理社区的应该是一些什么样的人?《五月花号公约》对此定义得非常清楚,是信仰上帝的人。而不是其他人。BM提到的两个条件,邀请、持有代币。这是规则,依然属于第三个问题。并没有回答,我们该邀请什么样的人。是想赚钱的人,还是有梦想的人。是上帝的信徒,还是马克思的信徒。

社区治理只是一种手段,不是目的。社区治理的目的是什么,共识要清楚。是为了赚钱,为了娱乐,还是为了创建一个新社会、新国家。BM的意思是打造一个比现实社会更为平等的伊甸园,可以理解为一个构建在虚拟世界中的新社会。但没有进一步明确。可能也不好明确。前面说了,绝大多数的EOS社区成员,对建设什么伊甸园没兴趣,他们只对赚钱有兴趣。

由此看来,这个根本共识既要兼顾赚钱的现实需求,又要兼顾一个更平等伊甸园的情怀梦想。等于是要鱼和熊掌一起兼得。太难了。可难,并不意味着不可能。事实上,一旦认知打通了,鱼和熊掌是可以兼得的。

我们不妨先给出一个假定性的结论,再来倒推。

假定EOS社区治理的根本性共识是这样的:我们这些追求财富自由的伙伴们,联合起来自组织一个社区,去创造一种跨文明新财富,来建设一个更平等的新社会。

2.4 我们是谁(追求财富自由的伙伴)

追求财富自由的人,赚钱的动力不用怀疑。可既然追求的是人生的财富自由,显然不会满足于赚点小钱、赚点快钱。而会更多地考虑怎样持续、稳定的赚钱,赚更多的钱。这样的人,我们可以称他们为“财富自由的信仰者”。

“财富自由的信仰者”,好歹也是有信仰的人了。只要能让他们看到赚钱更持久、赚更多钱的可能性。是不会排斥情怀和梦想的。

2.5 我们想做什么(创造新财富来建设更平等的新社会)

这是最大的认知难点了,后面会专门阐述。

这里先做个概述。我们生活的地球上,现实世界中的传统财富,早就按照既定规则和秩序被瓜分完毕了。金字塔尖的20%人瓜分了地球上80%以上的财富。我们处在金字塔底层的占全球总人口80%以上的平民百姓,要想赚多点钱都困难,要想大范围实现财富自由,完全没可能。

所以,平民百姓要广泛实现财富自由,在现实世界中是一定没希望的。必须另辟蹊径,发掘、创造完全不同于传统财富的新财富。而创造不同于传统财富的新财富,就要建立不同于传统财富的创造和分配新规则、新秩序。而一个更平等、更美好的新社会,正是在这个构建新规则、新秩序的过程中成长起来的。如此,我们就把现实的赚钱、追求财富自由,与建设“More Equal Animals”自由生存的伊甸园的情怀和梦想统一起来了。

这里我特别提醒BM:在当今这个经济社会,没有财富的平等,人与人之间有可能平等吗?没有财富权的平等,“More Equal Animals”就永远只能是一个梦想,根本没有实现的可能。理解了这一点,就能明白,为什么必须创造新财富,才有可能建设更平等的新社会。

2.6 我们怎么做(打造自组织社区)

只有当前面两个问题有了答案,有了社区治理的根本共识。再进入BM规划的治理草案中,一切才会显得顺理成章。

再回到我假设的这个社区治理根本共识,这是怎么来的。仅仅是一个假设,还是真的。如果是真的,这个共识又是怎么推演出来的。要回答这个问题,就会涉及到一个更深层次、更根本性的认知了。区块链的最大价值和意义究竟是什么?EOS公链的最大价值和意义又是什么?

第一部分: Eos社区治理和发展的深度思考(草稿第一部分)

Part

2. What is the fundamental consensus of EOS community governance

It is precisely because the fundamental consensus of EOS community governance has not been reached, Therefore, And so, if we ask anyone, including BM. can to express in one sentence: What is the fundamental consensus that our EOS community governance needs to reach? I think maybe no one can do it yet.

As we know that the United States, the only superpower in the world, was developed 400 years ago on the basis of a community consensus. This community consensus is the “Mayflower Convention.” If you want to express it in one sentence, you can summarize it as follows: we believers of God, voluntarily build a new order, and on this basis, build a new society (state) that can reflect the common interests of everyone.

It contains three-fold meaning, or it answers three questions.

2.1 Who are we (believers of God)

2.2 What do we want to do (build a new society with common interests)

2.3 What will we do (build a new order)

Contrast with BM’s community governance draft. We can find that in this draft, BM only answered the third question that how we will do it, but it did not answer the more important who will do and what.

BM mentioned in the draft that the first problem in community governance is to “determine who is in the community and who is not in the community.” This is actually the first question. What kind of people should the community consist of, and who should govern the community? The “Mayflower Convention” defines this very clearly and is a person who believes in God. But not others. The two conditions mentioned by BM are invitation and holding of tokens. This is the rule, and it still belongs to the third question. There is no answer as to what kind of people we should invite, those who want to make money, or those with dreams, believers in God, or believers in Marx.

Community governance is only a means, not a goal. What is the purpose of community governance, and the consensus should be clear . Is it to make money or entertain, or to create a new society, a new country. BM’s intention is to create a Garden of Eden that is more equal than the real society, which can be understood as a new society built in the virtual world. But without further clarification, it may be difficult to clarify. As mentioned earlier, most EOS community members are not interested in building a Garden of Eden, they are only interested in making money.

From this point of view, this fundamental consensus must take into account both the real needs of making money and the dream of a more equal Garden of Eden. It is equivalent to having both fish and bear’s paw together. It’s too difficult. But difficult does not mean impossible. In fact, once the cognition is established, you can have both fish and bear paws.

We might as well give a hypothetical conclusion first, and then reverse it.

Suppose that the fundamental consensus of EOS community governance is this: Those of us who are pursuing the freedom of wealth, unite to self-organize a community to create a new kind of cross-civilization wealth and build a new, more equal society.

2.4 Who are we (Those who pursue the freedom of wealth)

For those who pursue the freedom of wealth have no doubt about their motivation to make money. But since the pursuit of the freedom of wealth in life, obviously will not be satisfied to make a little money or make some quick money. But more consideration will be given to how to make money continuously and steadily to make more money. Such people, we can call them “believers of the freedom of wealth.”

For those “Believers in the freedom of wealth”,At least a man of faith. As long as they can see the possibility of making more lasting money and making more money. Will not reject feelings and dreams.

2.5 What do we want to do (create new wealth to build a new, more equal society)

This is the biggest cognitive difficulty, which will be elaborated later.

Here is an overview. On the earth where we live, the traditional wealth in the real world has long been divided up in accordance with established rules and orders. The 20% of the people at the tip of the pyramid share more than 80% of the wealth on the planet. We are at the bottom of the pyramid, the common people, who account for more than 80% of the global population. It is difficult to make more money, and it is completely impossible to realize the freedom of wealth on a large scale.

Therefore, it is certainly hopeless in the real world for ordinary people to realize the freedom of wealth widely. We must find another way to discover and create new wealth that is completely different from traditional wealth. The creation of new wealth that is different from traditional wealth requires the establishment of new rules and new orders for creation and distribution that are different from traditional wealth. And a new, more equal and better society has grown up in the process of constructing new rules and new orders. In this way, we have unified the reality of making money and pursuing the freedom of wealth with the feelings and dreams of building “More Equal Animals” in the Garden of Eden for free survival.

2.6 What do we do (build a self-organized community)

Only the two previous questions have answers, and there is a fundamental consensus on community governance. After entering the governance draft of the BM plan, everything will appear logical.

Let’s return to the fundamental consensus on community governance that I assumed, and how this came about. Is it just a hypothesis, or is it true. If it’s true, how is this consensus derived? To answer this question, a deeper and more fundamental understanding will be involved. What is the greatest value and significance of the blockchain? What is the greatest value and significance of the EOS public chain?

IPFS-CID:QmNUuCdo7GnMt5u2NTyn5ZJttrzxrkJJjipiVCTsAPwEhG

PartⅠ:Thoughts in-deep on EOS community governance and development (Draft)

2 Likes

为了创造并保护新财富,需要建立更公平、更安全、更具凝聚力、吸引力和扩张性的机制

2 Likes